
Friday, May 1, 2009
Is My Generation Stupid?
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
NYC Scare
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Spring Game
So what we do have is the ability to believe in what we have. Sure we lost a few top players who were great to the program and will prove to be great NFL players. But losing the old and bringing in new blood allows for more heroes (and villains) to be made. I think that is what this team needed desperately. The old guard was proving to be ineffective and often time lacked a certain emotion in games. Mental lapses and inter-squad turmoil pervaded this past season, and we still almost beat a darn good Texas squad in the Fiesta Bowl. Now we have new players, new breath, new life. These players are pieces of highly recruited classes of which many of the others were not. Generally speaking, the talent is more potent now than it was then and it has already shown via the spring game. Will OSU go on to win a national title this year? Maybe. This team is young and loose which is a refreshing departure from the uptight squads of recent days gone by. In any case, my hopes are certainly high for this team, but I've learned one very valuable thing over the years: One game at a time. Go Bucks!
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
The overuse of the words "literally" and "surreal"
The two words that always get misused far too often are "literally" and "surreal". An example of such lunacy came to my attention while I was waiting for an appointment. The office only had entertainment genre magazines, so I explored a particular magazine article that had published an interview with the newest "pop-tart" who has her own T.V. show, concert tour, and a B-list former mullet-wearing celebrity father. In the interview, she was asked "what's the first thing you do when you get out of bed?". She replied, "well normally my mom or dad pours me some cereal and I'll listen to some music to get me going. But today I had to do it myself and it was really surreal!" Really? Making your own breakfast is surreal? Let's look at Webster's definition of surreal for a moment. Webster's defines surreal as: "marked by the intense irrational reality of a dream". Is making your cereal that much of a dream? Really? Now if the cereal had little dancing leprechauns coming out of the box, then I could at least see why the use of "surreal" might be applied.
The second of these overused words is "literally". I hear this particular verbal mangling on a daily basis it seems. One of my more memorable encounters with such a damaging misuse was in--of all places--a bookstore. I was browsing through the "Essays" section of the store when I overheard a conversation from a group of young girls. I couldn't tell if they were in high school or older, but they were in that range in any case. They were talking about what they did at lunch and one of them mentioned eating a "really good" sandwich from the cafeteria. Another replied with a similar sentiment but added "I literally sat down and ate the sandwich too". Maybe it's me but isn't literally sitting down to eat a sandwich self-explanatory? Can you metaphorically sit down and eat a sandwich? Come on ladies, you can do better than that. Here's Webster's definition: "in effect; actually". Would the sentence mean any less if you took literally out of it? NO! You don't need the word!
I oftent think that people who do misue these particular words do so because they don't know any other way to describe a situation. So if something seems like it could be surreal or literal, then they throw it in as if to sound more intelligent. Also, they probably see particular celebrities use those words often, and therefore do the same. My advice? Build a vocabulary and quit watching celebrities. Maybe even read a book! There are many other words to describe situations than literally or surreal, and if you want people to take what you are saying more seriously, I would suggest finding dropping the words all together unless absolutely needed. (End of Rant)
Monday, April 20, 2009
Quote for the Day
Am I In?
Friday, April 17, 2009
Square One
Most of my life has been sheltered and privileged in a world that many would consider aesthetically pleasing and relatively fertile with opportunity and gain. There are certainly benefits to this for which I am grateful every day, but it is also a handicap in some ways. Having things given to you with little struggle doesn't fulfill my sense of reward or achievement. What have I really done? It's not to say I haven't worked hard and earned whatever rewards or accolades I've achieved in life thus far. I could have had my college tuition paid for with my savings, but I wanted to earn a scholarship, and did. And this brings me to my point: I don't want to spend my life relying on people/things that I haven't earned without ever knowing I could do the same thing.
Former President Theodore Roosevelt said, "I wish to preach, not the doctrine of ignoble ease, but the doctrine of the strenuous life, the life of toil and effort, of labor and strife; to preach that highest form of success which comes, not to the man who desires mere easy peace, but to the man who does not shrink from danger, from hardship, or from bitter toil, and who out of these wins the splendid ultimate triumph." When I read this, it blew me away. It is something I wish more of my generational peers would read rather than expect things to fall into their collective laps. The idea of the "strenuous life" is, I think, a primary reason why I came out of the Midwest and to the West. Because I could start fresh and, in essence, live the strenuous life. I could learn what it is to struggle, to truly earn something, to achieve at a base level. This, I believe, will be beneficial to me because I will continue to learn how to work hard for what I want and how to achieve it from nothing. Combine that with the actual networks of people I know and benefits I've been so lucky to have, and it will make for a smart and effective way to live.
Thankfully I have a strong and amazing woman to help me along the way :)
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
For those interested where our money is going....
Where do the "teabaggers" think we should cut? Yeah......
Quote for the Day
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Day 7: Checks
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Day 6: Zombie Jesus Day
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Quote for the Day: The logic (or lack there of) of Easter
Day 5: Fences
Friday, April 10, 2009
Day 4: Grilled Cheese
Newsweek article about the "end" of Christian America
http://www.newsweek.com/id/192583/page/1
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Day 3: Pamphlets
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Review: 3:10 to Yuma
As far as characters, I think the two primary characters were obviously very interesting. They were deeper than just good or bad and were where they were due to circumstance. For me, the most interesting character was Wade's main follower (off-white coat and blond beard). He seemed like he always had something to prove, maybe to even become Ben Wade. The guy had a fierce passion to be loyal to Wade, even threatening to kill fellow members of the Wade gang. I can understand this kind of loyalty, but not to his obsession. Overall, it was a well-done movie and would recommend to others.
Quote for the Day
Day 2: Windy
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Cathartic
Day 1: Lonesome
I think some of the added stress is coming from my new job. I started less than a week ago and it's as if I'm scattered already. But I don't think it's just me. I think they are a little contradictory in what they are asking and maybe a little less helpful than they think. First, we were to make an initial list of people to contact in the area to give a demo to and potentially make a sale. Since I moved to the Reno area roughly a month ago, I really haven't made all that many contacts. So I went with who I knew and it's been kind of a slow start to say the least. I asked what I could do better and they said to consider asking neighbors. But that is contradictory to their policy of 1) making sure the person we ask to perform a demo for is ok with it, and 2) that we don't knock door-to-door. What if asking the neighbors fails? We aren't supposed to call our recs yet because they haven't shown us the proper way to go about calling. Further, they don't tell us certain techniques and deals that we can present until AFTER our intial meetings. Is that really beneficial or productive for us or the business? I don't think so. I think they should start out with a beginner's list for new employees. On the list would include 5 to 10 names to whom the beginners could call and actually practice making a sale instead of wandering around without any direction.
Monday, April 6, 2009
Dylan on Obama (interesting take)
BF: You liked Barack Obama early on. Why was that?
BD: I’d read his book and it intrigued me.
BF: Audacity of Hope?
BD: No it was called Dreams of My Father.
BF: What struck you about him?
BD: Well, a number of things. He’s got an interesting background. He’s like a fictional character, but he’s real. First off, his mother was a Kansas girl. Never lived in Kansas though, but with deep roots. You know, like Kansas bloody Kansas. John Brown the insurrectionist. Jesse James and Quantrill. Bushwhackers, Guerillas. Wizard of Oz Kansas. I think Barack has Jefferson Davis back there in his ancestry someplace. And then his father. An African intellectual. Bantu, Masai, Griot type heritage - cattle raiders, lion killers. I mean it’s just so incongruous that these two people would meet and fall in love. You kind of get past that though. And then you’re into his story. Like an odyssey except in reverse.
People Watching
To Emmy:
Unicorn